![]() |
|
|
![]() |
#16 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: phoenix
Posts: 2,056
|
Quote:
They'll contribute 2.3M to get matching funds of 7M. So, 9.3M allocated to that chart per year. (approximately). So they spent just over 1/2 million on habitat development and just under 1/2 million to evaluate it each year. For how many years now? Hmmm.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. blah, blah, blah, that's all i got to say about that~! roadkill46 You're a vile piece of shit. ThereHeIs |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
#17 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 189
|
Thanks again Don, so it should look more like this:
Quote:
Assuming full budget is used based on FY13 Sport Fish Fund allotment: Fed Sport Fish Trust Fund: $2,355,343.01 AZ G&F Project Cash: $583,835.75 $2,939,178.76 Total (roughly, $1 per trout) Quote:
$796,139.66 - Fed Sport Fund + AZ G&F Project money to purchase Trout and Catfish for the Urban Fishing program, plus other Urban Fishing program expenses. Urban fish stocking (200,000 pounds of fish per year is all I have found, versus any specific numbers of Catfish and Trout purchased). Quote:
Almost 3 million dollars with 2.3 million of our trust fund ready to help... . |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 189
|
The Sport Fund pie chart is for FY14/FY15, but I wouldn't expect it to be much different year to year. To understand exactly how our Sport Fish fund was utilized over the past 5 years, I think I'll have to contact the Federal Aid Coordinator to gather the specific project details.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
#19 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: phoenix
Posts: 2,056
|
Quote:
In another perspective, five FTEs @ 100k / year, evaluating.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. blah, blah, blah, that's all i got to say about that~! roadkill46 You're a vile piece of shit. ThereHeIs |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 189
|
Between Habitat Evaluation and Habitat Development, it is almost $1,000,000 per year. That should get some new habitat for some of our lakes. Maybe if you look at them combined, it makes more sense...
11% of the our Sport Fish Fund on habitat improvement. There is a typo the Sport Fund Breakdown spreadsheet picture and I can't go back and edit it at this point -- I have Habitat Evaluation in two places, instead of the 6% as Habitat Development. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 189
|
I did find the numbers of trout and catfish that are purchased each year to stock the 21 Urban Lakes.
65,000 Trout (10-13 inches) from Colorado 107,000 Catfish (13-18 inches) ...and some Bluegill from Arkansas These are pretty expensive fish: $640,000 to purchase and transport... and 9% of our Sport Fish Fund. . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tucson
Posts: 281
|
Habitat evaluation, includes the invasive species program, water, riparian and aquatic habitats, including evaluation of impacts to those resources and identification of mitigation and/or conservation measures to minimize potential impacts. An example of some of the things they do are review Dept. of Water Resources Water Protection Fund Grant applications, Review in-stream flow applications for the Dept. of Water Resources, Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) coordination, Colorado River Multi-species Conservation Plan (MSCP), Aquatic Habitat Improvement projects, Transportation projects affecting aquatic/riparian habitats, Review development plans affecting aquatic resources. All of these things are tied back to our managing of your fishing resource.
The urban program is only partially funded through DJ, a large portion of that program's funding comes from a trust fund that has been set up to collect fees from participating entities. Each city or town that has lakes in the urban program pays a fee to be involved in the program. That fee is put in the trust fund to partially fund the program. Spoon, I'm not following your math in your previous post, but yes, fish management is where the funding would come from for a project at a specific lake. Additionally, there could be a combination of any of the other programs shown in the pie chart involved as well spending a portion of their DJ on a specific project. But keep in mind that the 3 mil based on your numbers that your looking at in Fish management is split up between 6 regions and the fish branch in Phx to fund statewide activities. Its not a lump sum just looking for a place to be spent. It pays for what I do down here in the south, what the guys in Yuma do, water quality programs statewide, etc.....
__________________
Don Mitchell Fisheries Program Manager Arizona Game and Fish Department 555 N. Greasewood Rd. Tucson, AZ. 85745 (520) 388-4451 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 189
|
Quote:
Quote:
Most of the information on AZ G&F funding and operations seems to be publically available, but it is scattered. So by piecing it together from documents on the Internet, I know it won't be perfectly accurate. Posting it here and having people question the data definitely helps -- thanks. Quote:
Longer term, the idea is to change the warm water sport fish management policy away from the current sustained-yield/disaster recovery model. Last edited by Spoonplugger; August 16th, 2013 at 10:27 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 189
|
Quote:
The 9% Sport Fund Usage for the Urban Fish program is called out in the Sport Fish pie chart, which is roughly $640,000 of the Sport Fish Fund allotment. I'm not an expert fish buyer, but this does seem like premium priced trout and catfish--Maybe AZ is getting a good deal on these fish, but it seems like an expensive way to stock. Potential year over year savings here might help the position for warm-water hatchery operations in AZ. From the Urban Fish Guide... http://www.azgfd.gov/regs/urbanregs.pdf |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Peoria
Posts: 4,236
|
I'm wondering if the new license fees that will implemented will generate more $$ over time to support the whole program rather $$$'s earmarked from urban fishing licenses trout ect.. I'm thinking there will be a cost reduction in a streamlined license as well. 3 million trout seems like a lot of $$$ to support a fishery that is basicly 6 months and very little carry over. I have never understood put and take mentality as a whole. It's great for urban lakes for kids, but it seems like a huge cost for little return.
__________________
Retired and loving it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,517
|
Quote:
![]() Seriously though, I'm curious about the new license structure as well. It's my understanding that the Urban program was paid for by the cities and by the Urban license fees. Without the specific license fee (coupled with the fact that a huge chunk of us buy a combo hunt/fish license anyways which is only going up $3), I would think the accounting will get messier. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Member
|
Quote:
Delw 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
__________________
Hot Rod Johnson -- "the man, the myth, the self-proclaimed legend." @#muskielivesmatter @#bullsharklivesmattermore |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|