Yeah dude when a democrat is in office its ok to be at war wherever and whenever. Put a republican in office and and all wars are unjust and illegal... BTW I thought we were supposed to be out of Iraq by now?WTH are we doing in Afghanistan? Come on now you Bush haters. This statist is going to send more troops there too?where are all you war anti activists? It's ok now since Obama is doing it? Frickin' hyprocites.
OK, let's see if I get this straight.
Osama Bin Laden orchestrates the 9/11 attacks and goes into hiding in Afghanistan, Bush invades Iraq to dethrone Saddam Hussein because he supposedly has WMD. In your eye's that is OK.
Obama is sending more troops to Afghanistan where Osama Bin Laden is still running the show,
which is where our troops should have gone in the first place, and this is a bad thing.
Can you please explain your thought processes on this one?
1. Is Osama Bin Laden responsible for 9/11? YES!
2. Was Saddam Hussein responsible for 9/11? NO!
3. Did we ever find WMD's in Iraq? NO!
4. Is Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan? YES!
5. Is Osama Bin Laden in Iraq? NO!
6. Do we still want to get Osama Bin Laden? YES!
7. Do we still want to attack the heart of Al Qaeda? YES!
8. Shouldn't we be in Afghanistan then? YES!
So now tell me, what part of being in Iraq was right, and being in Afghanistan is wrong.
I am sure somebody will come up with an excuse and justify it in their mind.
NOPE!"Did Osama not bomb WTC 2 times, the first being unsuccessful?"
We attacked the Taliban as soon as we had PROOF they were protecting Bin Laden, who was behind 9/11. If you could look at a calender you would see this was BEFORE IRAQ.I was there!
Going into Iraq right after 9/11 for the reason's we did was wrong.
Did we need to go into Iraq for other reasons, YES! Just like we should and probably will end up doing something in Iran, JMO!
Did we need to go into Iraq when we should have gone right after Osama, NO!
I am not a Democrat! But hey thanks for judging me! I classify myself as more independent.
"Your history is a little off we did go into Afghan first."
1. After 9/11, What DATE did we go into Afghanistan?
2. After 9/11, What DATE did we go into Iraq?
"1. Why did Bill Clinton not take Bin Laden when Saudi offered him up. Then we would not be in either Country right now." What had Bin Laden done at that time?
"2. obama in his presidential campaign said he would have the troops out of Iraq in 6 months. My buddies are still there." I don't know the answer to that one, but then again that is not the topic of this thread.
The 1993 World Trade Center bombing occurred on February 26, 1993, Bill Clinton took office on January 20, 1993.
So if anyone would have had intellgence on the WTC bombings it would have been George H. W. Bush.
txsriggd,Liberals are like hemoroids,they just love hanging around assholes. Obummer is a liar, marxist,asshole.The people that defend him are obviouly of the same moral character. United Socialist States of America is a reallity,the civil war wasn't just about freeing slaves, now we have a goverment that is determined to enslave us. Ballots or bullets,what is it going to take to stay free.The feds own the banks,transportation and are trying to own healthcare.If you don't understand how these things are inner connected to your freedom then you are a dumdass that needs an "Obamanation": Jerk-it
If I was wanting to attack you on a personal basis I would have mentioned your name,though I dissagree with you and it pisses me off,:beatingdeadhorse:as far as I know you are an U.S.citizen and your right to free speech far out wieghs my desire for you to shutthefkup and vice-versa. It seems though that liberals and demi's think only they have that right.Splitshot asked an honest question.but liberals/demi's don't like to be asked ?'s.It doesn't matter that people believed him,the point was that he lied and people died so WHY in your vast intelligent opinion that you love to share are they not vocal against that fact. :beatingdeadhorse:txsriggd,
Was all this directed at me, or were you just talking in general.
"Liberal is synonymous with individual freedom. This includes concepts such as democracy, capitalism, and freedoms of thought, religion, etc. The opposite of this is therefore not conservative, as is popularly believed, but rather totalitarianism and intolerance.
Conservative on the other hand means resistive to change or supporting slow change.
It is easily possible to be both liberal and conservative at the same time."